The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in pick out juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, it is also a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of one day during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged event as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred for being the real brothers of the deceased but they didn't respond in any respect into the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on lots of situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak type of evidence which may be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is also relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on a motorcycle at 4.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that check here the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we're obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject matter for the approval from the competent authority.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological aspects allows for the more detailed legal response.
only on the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
six. Mere involvement in a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering that then he is behind the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more expected for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not provide any effective purpose at this stage.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Undertaking a case law search can be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which include:
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of your petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )